Discussion about this post

User's avatar
bmwin's avatar

Any chance you’re working on a new book? One either centered on the above analysis or incorporating it to a significant degree?

Expand full comment
Ann Norman's avatar

"The repeated changes in Bhumibol’s story are another clue about what really happened on June 9, 1946. He was never able to give a credible explanation for his brother’s death." Good point. So, if two of those accused of Ananda's murder were eyewitnesses, why didn't they report the truth? Did they think they would be saved at the last minute as a pay-off for their silence?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts